|

The event, sponsored by a
variety of educational and freethought organizations including HAGSA, was
held at the La Sierra Community Center in Carmichael. As it was last year,
it was actually held on Darwin’s birthday—February 12.
The meeting began with an
introduction by Paul Geisert. Mygna Futrell introduced the keynote
speaker, Nicholas Matzke, of the National Center for Science Education (NCSC).
Nicholas has Bachelors degrees in Biology and Chemistry and a Masters in
Geography. He worked for the legal team for the plaintiffs in the
Kitzmiller case in Dover, PA. This case was a successful legal challenge
to the introduction of the "intelligent design" (ID) concept into the
biology courses in that town’s public high school.
A couple of years ago, the
creationists on the Dover school board pushed through a proposal to teach
ID as a scientific alternative to evolution in the biology curriculum. In
the case of Kitzmiller, et al v. Dover School District, et al, the
plaintiffs took the rational position that ID is a religious, not a
scientific concept, and thus has no place in the science classes of a
public school. ID proponents might accept some evolution and do not insist
that the world is only 6,000 years old. However, since organisms and
biological functions are so complex, they maintain that there is no way
they could have originated through random mutation and Darwinian natural
selection. There must have been a designer. Guess who is the designer? The
judge, although an appointee of George W. Bush, ruled in favor of the
plaintiffs. Not only did he rule in their favor, he did so in terms strong
enough that they exceeded their expectations. Last November, those
creationists up for reelection were defeated. The result was a new school
board that has since announced that it will not appeal the judge’s
decision.
Nicholas Matzke went into
the history of the creation-evolution legal battles, beginning with the
Scopes "monkey trial" in Dayton, TN, in 1925. There was a lot of good
publicity for the pro-evolution side in that case, but the creationists
actually won in court. The result was a downgrading of or even total
silence about evolution in American schools for decades, especially in
southern states.
There was a revival of
science education in the wake of Sputnik in 1957. However, anti-evolution
laws remained on the books in some states. The pro-evolution side won in
Epperson v. Arkansas (1968), a case that challenged such a law. After that
decision, "creationism" evolved into "creation science." This was
challenged successfully in McLear vs. Arkansas (1981). In the case of
Edwards v. Aguillard (1987), which challenged a Louisiana law, the United
States Supreme Court ruled against "creation science." Justice Antonin
Scalia dissented. The creationists then came up with the idea of
"intelligent design." The text they used was that of "Of Pandas and
People." The plaintiffs in the Kitzmiller case had the help of the ACLU,
Americans United and the NCSC. The defendants had the support of the
Thomas More Law Center. The plaintiffs were able to use subpoena power to
obtain early drafts of "Of Pandas and People" and showed in court that
wherever the original drafts had the word "creation," the book as
published had the words "intelligent design." In addition, the arguments
of Michael Behe, one of the leading ID proponents, were demolished in
court.
The religious origin of the
ID concept was made plain for all to see and the judge ruled accordingly.
In the question and answer
period, Matzke suggested that, if the courts continue to reject ID, the
next creationist buzz term may be "critical examination of evolution."
Report prepared by Wayne Luney, Recorder
Click
below to return to the list of 2006 Meetings or to go to the previous or
next meeting report.
|