|
Laurens
Gunnarsen is a physicist and the son of HAGSA members Walter and Margo
Gunnarsen. He had spoken at previously meetings about his work with
exceptionally gifted children. This talk was about creativity, what it is,
how to nurture it and how to measure it. Part of the problem with
creativity is that it is difficult to accurately define and measure. Dr.
Gunnarsen alluded to Justice Potter Stewart's famous line about
pornography, "I can't define it but I know it when I see it," but
creativity is more complex than that. Often true creativity is not
recognized until decades after it has occurred.
Dr. Gunnarsen was critical of the idea that creativity is simply the
result of hard work, as some have suggested. A lot of natural talent is
also required. How does one identify and nurture the talented people? He
cited Soviet research from the 1950s to identify mathematically gifted
children. He quoted Timothy Gowers who defined a prodigy as someone who
can do something at a young age that others can do only after long study
or not at all. However, for solving problems, genius is often neither
necessary nor sufficient. Some first rate mathematicians were not good at
arithmetic in grade school!
Dr. Gunnarsen went into the subject of intelligence and creativity
testing. He cited a longitudinal study by Terman of those who did well on
intelligence tests. They generally did well in their careers but two
future Nobel Prize winners just missed the cut for his study. There were
no Nobel Laureates in his study group. He missed some of the most creative
people! Intelligence testing was first applied in a big way in America in
the First World War. It was used to sort out draftees for various military
jobs in that war and in subsequent wars. After the war the tests were used
extensively in education. Creativity tests were devised for pilots in the
Second World War. Since then the creativity tests have been criticized for
giving essentially the same results as intelligence tests and for not
being correlated with later creative achievement. Laurens suggested that
the Welch test, which is essentially an aesthetics test, might be a good
indicator of future creativity. Gowers claims that the more creative
people preferred ambiguous drawings while less creative people preferred
regular, straightforward drawings. However, even today we do not have good
standardized tests for creativity for most of the arts and sciences.
The question period brought references to John Donne's opinion that genius
and madness are closely related. We also considered as likely the idea
that many creative people were able to winnow the "possible" solutions for
a problem to a number small enough that their unconscious minds could
handle without being overwhelmed.
Report
prepared by Wayne Luney, Recorder
Click
below to return to the list of 2006 Meetings or to go to the previous or
next meeting report.
|